1st Hour-KTTH & KIRO
Download Part 1
It’s every family’s worst nightmare. You place a loved one in a nursing home, trusting that the facility you’ve chosen will provide the kind of quality care they need. But after a few months, you realize that, instead of providing excellent care, the nursing home is plagued with neglect, chronically understaffed, and filled with residents whose needs are barely being met. What’s going on here?
According to this eye-opening report in a recent New York Times issue, part of this crisis in care almost appears intentional. A growing number of nursing home owners have set up an opaque network of financial dealings in which the homes they own contract out many critical services to companies that are actually owned (or controlled) by the very same owners. In the words of the New York Times, “In what has become an increasingly common business arrangement, owners of nursing homes outsource a wide variety of goods and services to companies in which they have a financial interest or that they control.” These tidy in-house relationships, known as “related party transactions,” now involve more than 11,000 nursing homes, about three-quarters of U.S. nursing care facilities. (This is based on an analysis of financial records by Kaiser Health News.)
The New York Times article says that the owners claim this kind of outsourcing – which can even extend to a nursing home renting their own building from a sister corporation – is efficient and helps reduce tax liability. But it seems like the practice has gotten out of hand: “Contracts with related companies accounted for $11 billion of nursing home spending in 2015,” says the article. According to Medicare analysis, that represents one-tenth of their earnings
These related party transactions, which are typically hidden behind a web of shell corporations and holding companies, represent a gold mine for nursing home owners. As the New York Times puts it, “Owners can arrange highly favorable contracts in which their nursing homes pay more than they might in a competitive market. Owners then siphon off higher profits, which are not recorded on the nursing home’s accounts.” In one example citing a California-based chain, the nursing homes owned by the company were paying rents to another related company, rents that were one-third higher than comparable rates in the same counties. This firm, called Brius Healthcare Services, is currently being audited by the State of California.
Besides being fiscally lucrative, these related party transactions also bring legal benefits to the nursing home owners. “When a nursing home is sued,” says the Times, “injured residents and their families have a much harder time collecting money from the related companies — the ones with the full coffers.” Many aggrieved residents and their families give up in frustration. No wonder nursing home owners like these arrangements so much.
These legal and financial arrangements are not illegal, but they definitely have a negative impact on care, according to the Times article. Kaiser Health News reported that “nursing homes that outsource to related organizations…have fewer nurses and aides per patient, they have higher rates of patient injuries and unsafe practices, and they are the subject of complaints almost twice as often as independent homes.” One nursing professor familiar with the set-up said, “Almost every single one of these chains is doing the same thing. They’re just pulling money away from staffing.” The statistics uncovered by Kaiser were damning:
At AgingOptions, we have heard more horror stories than we can count about family members receiving poor, overpriced care at nursing homes. Does that mean all these facilities are substandard? Definitely not – but it does mean that families have to do their homework before they make any sort of commitment to long-term nursing care. We know that most seniors dream of aging in their own homes, but the vast majority will not be able to achieve that goal and will end up in some other type of housing. According to some statistics, about 25 percent of all seniors age 65-plus will someday spend time in a nursing home. If you’re blessed with real longevity – reaching age 95 – the odds that you’ll live in a nursing home are close to 50 percent. That means many of our AgingOptions radio listeners and blog readers will be faced with the challenge of evaluating a care facility for themselves, a spouse or a loved one. If you’ll contact us, we can put you in touch with excellent resources such as our recommended partner Better Care Management who can guide you through the evaluation and selection process.
When it comes to needing a guide, the professionals at AgingOptions are standing by to guide you into the type of retirement you’ve always hoped for. You’ll find that there’s much more to planning for retirement than making the right housing choices: a comprehensive plan also means your finances, legal affairs, medical protection and family communication all need to be included as well. There’s only one type of plan that encompasses all these: a LifePlan from AgingOptions. If you’d like to learn more, please accept this invitation to join Rajiv Nagaich at an upcoming LifePlanning Seminar, an information-packed few hours that will change your view of retirement forever. There’s no cost, and no obligation.
For dates, times and locations, click here where you can register online for the seminar of your choice (or call us for assistance during the week). We’ll look forward to meeting you!
(Originally reported at www.nytimes.com)
When it comes to health care, most of us tend to focus on what happens to us when we’re sick. Is the doctor’s visit covered? What about hospitalization? Does my prescription drug benefit cover the new pills my doctor is prescribing?
These are important questions, it’s true – but good health means far more than what happens to us when we’re sick and need a doctor’s care. Good health is really about prevention. Nevertheless, too often it seems as if the medical and pharmaceutical industries, abetted by the insurance companies, rule the health care landscape, causing us patients to consume more expensive, traditional health care than we need while failing to help us adopt the kind of personal habits and lifestyle changes that might really cause us to live longer, healthier lives.
In researching this topic, we read about a study from some years ago, reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which showed that about half of all deaths in the United States in 2000 were due to preventable behaviors and exposures. This same study estimates that 400,000 people die each year in the United States due to poor diet and a sedentary lifestyle. Since this study appeared more than a decade ago, we suspect that the situation has only gotten worse – a suspicion that was corroborated as we scrutinized this set of data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The website offers a table of statistics that paint a disturbing picture of just how bad the lifestyle choices of the average American actually are!
Let’s consider a few examples:
Some groups have tried using a reward system to get people to improve their health habits. One such program, described in this article that appeared last month on the website of Kaiser Health News, cited an initiative for Medicaid patients that provided, for example, a $25 Target gift card as an incentive for a women to get a mammogram. Do these reward-based programs work? “Overall, research on the effectiveness of financial incentives for the Medicaid population has been mixed,” says the Kaiser analysis. Researchers said some incentives “can induce people to keep an appointment or attend a class but are less likely to yield long-term behavior changes, such as weight loss.” Our take-away from this idea is simple: you as a consumer need to take charge of your own health care, for your own sake and for the sake of those you love. No gift card or other reward is going to motivate you to change, and the traditional medical establishment likely won’t be of much help.
Our philosophy at AgingOptions is explained by Rajiv Nagaich. “Health planning is more than simply having an insurance policy that will allow you to access medical care when you are ill,” says Rajiv. “Our view is that you should have an insurance policy that will allow you to take better care of yourself – one that allows you to self-refer to a nutritionist, for example, or other preventive care specialist. We think true insurance should provide access to a personal trainer, or at the very least provide free gym membership along the lines of the Silver Sneakers program.” As important as it will be to have access to acute care, says Rajiv, true preventive care could be more important to most of us in the long run.
“We spend more time trying to patch up bodies that are broken due to preventable illness,” says Rajiv, “but precious little time making sure the body does not break in the first place!” He adds, “While we at AgingOptions can’t change the current reality of American medical care, we can advise our clients and friends to demand more from the health care system. It’s up to you and me to shift the focus of health care away from curing sickness toward preventing it. That’s the key to a longer, healthier life.”
Are you going to hear words like this from your traditional doctor? Odds are the answer is no – which is why we encourage you to join Rajiv Nagaich at an AgingOptions LifePlanning seminar soon. Rajiv will show you how medical, financial, legal, housing and family plans all have to work together as you plan for your retirement future. There are some things that the medical industry would rather you did not know, just as there are “dark corners” in many industries: in real estate, where some realtors provide poor advice to those looking for a retirement home; in finance, where financial planners often seek to keep fees and commissions secret; and in the legal profession, where attorneys can too frequently behave unscrupulously.
The bottom line is simple: you need an advocate and a guide. Come to a free LifePlanning Seminar and see this fresh new approach to retirement planning for yourself. For a complete list of currently scheduled seminars, click here for details and online registration or give us a call so we can help you take charge of all aspects of your retirement. Age on!
Some months ago we read a report on the blog of the AARP that revealed a problem too often overlooked, but one that will sound familiar to a significant number of Americans. The problem is the growing number of people, estimated at nearly 24 million workers, who are holding down paying jobs while at the same time serving as family caregivers. That’s a sure prescription for stress, fatigue and uncertainty, not only for employees but also for employers. “For employers big and small,” says AARP, “the need to support workers who also provide unpaid care for a family member is a growing reality.”
You can read the AARP article by clicking here. Even though the article first appeared in mid-2016, the information – and the predicament of working caregivers that it describes – are all too relevant today. For a more recent look at this issue, we suggest this more recent article just published in the popular magazine Consumer Reports.
These days, says AARP, serving as a caregiver to an adult relative (especially an aging parent) is growing more and more complex than it may have been in the past. Caregivers today often have to navigate a fiendishly complicated health care delivery system while performing more intense and complex care in the home, all while coping with the demands of work. Research suggests that employed caregivers feel a growing sense of stress and performance anxiety at work, with more and more pressure and less and less job security. Research also reveals that parents who are caring for young children at home often enjoy far more workplace flexibility than workers who are caring for older family members. Some caregivers even suggest they have experienced workplace discrimination, which according to an AARP research report from 2012, is not prohibited by most federal and state employment laws.
In a study entitled Caregiving in the United States 2015, cited by AARP, about 60 percent of family caregivers report they are also employed outside the home, and most of these “working caregivers” (nearly two-thirds) are caring for a relative 65 years old or older. According to the Consumer Reports story, “Providing care for a friend or family member is a labor of love for the 40 million people who are coping with that challenge. But taking on caregiving responsibilities can be costly.” The article quotes a 2016 AARP survey which found that unpaid caregivers spend an average of almost $7,000 a year on out-of-pocket expenses. But that’s only part of the financial burden on caregivers. “An earlier AARP study estimated that missed wages and Social Security benefits totaled $234,000 for male caregivers and $324,000 for women, who are more likely to drop out of the workforce.” This loss has a lifetime effect on their retirement future.
As if this weren’t enough of a recipe for stress, the caregivers are also aging: half of these employed caregivers are themselves 50 years old or older, which means they are already experiencing the challenges of being an older worker in today’s high-stress, increasingly insecure workplace.
There are two chief take-aways from these articles. The first, in the words of the AARP blog: “As the U.S. population rapidly ages, the need to support workers with family caregiving responsibilities will grow.” In other words, AARP favors more generous family leave and paid sick day policies, along with greater work flexibility for caregivers. The organization advocates legislation to give caregivers increased measures of employment security and, when necessary, paid time off. Above all, we need a “culture of understanding about eldercare needs” especially as they affect those in the workplace.
The second point is more concerning: as the population ages, “we’re facing a caregiving cliff,” said Dr. Susan Reinhard, AARP Public Policy expert. “By mid-century, there will only be three caregivers available for each person requiring care.” As today’s baby boomers age, there may not be enough people able to care for them. “That means,” says AARP’s Reinhard, “we need to provide support for existing caregivers who are underserved” by current services. In other words, we had better be planning now for the caregiving needs of the not-too-distant future.
Planning for the future is the centerpiece of our activities here at AgingOptions, and that includes planning for your future care needs. This will most probably involve your family members, because aging is a family affair. Have you sat down and talked with your adult children about your expectations and wishes for the future? Have you and your family members had an honest conversation about the fears and concerns each of you is experiencing as you contemplate your aging years? Far too many families leave these issues unaddressed and unresolved until it’s too late. Here at AgingOptions, we frequently conduct family conferences in which all these issues are laid out on the table for open, constructive discussion. We would be glad to do that for you. Through planning and preparation, you can successfully avoid becoming a burden to your loved ones as you age, and also avoid being forced into unplanned institutional care.
The key is to have your own personalized AgingOptions LifePlan – our name for a fully-developed, individualized retirement plan that takes all your needs into account: financial plans, legal protection, medical coverage, housing options and family communication. If you’re ready to start creating your own LifePlan, we can help. The best way to start is to join Rajiv Nagaich at one of our free LifePlanning Seminars – popular, information-packed sessions held in various locations throughout the area. These seminars fill up fast, however, so we encourage you not to wait. Instead you can click here for dates, and free online registration. It will be a pleasure working with you as together we plan your ideal future.
(originally reported at http://blog.aarp.org)
No doubt you’ve read articles in recent years lamenting the demise of the traditional pension system and claiming that the economic outlook for today’s retirees is grim. But at least one expert says, “Not so fast!” The future of retirement, he writes in this Bloomberg article, is actually brighter than ever. We thought we would share his views with you to see how you react: are we or are we not in a “retirement crisis”?
The author is Ramesh Ponnuru, who not only writes for Bloomberg but is also seni0r editor of National Review. It’s long past time, says Ponnuru, for Americans to “stop mourning the loss of traditional pensions” as evidence for retirement pessimism. In the Bloomberg piece he cites one recent article in the Washington Post that tracked a group of retirees in Oklahoma whose pensions had disappeared in 1994. For this group of nearly 1,000 retirees, the outcome turned out to be grim. The Washington Post story, according to Ponnuru, “features bankruptcies, lost homes and long-deferred retirements. It’s compelling [and] it’s sad.” But is it “a useful guide to the future of American retirement?” Definitely not: instead, says Ponnuru, articles like this one – and there have been many – are part of a chorus of negative journalism “that laments the decline of the traditional defined-benefit pension and the rise of defined-contribution plans such as 401(k)s.”
The reason Ponnuru takes issue with this notion that the “good old days” of retirement pensions were so rosy, and the newer model of 401(k)-style plans so dangerous for retirees, is that he believes journalists who makes these claims overlook the facts – and in some ways he may have a valid point. Writing in Bloomberg, Ponnuru cites four specific areas in which negative stories about loss of pensions miss the mark.
First, he writes, these articles “gloss over how rare defined-benefit pensions really were.” We tend to think that a generation or so ago every worker enjoyed pension benefits, but that’s far from the truth. “Even at the mid-1970s peak of defined-benefit plans,” writes Ponnuru, “fewer than 40 percent of private-sector workers had them.” By contrast, he says, more than 60 percent of private-sector workers are now participating in a retirement plan, and among all workers the percentage vested in any retirement plan has risen by 80 percent since 1979.
Second, the articles that lament the loss of pensions tend to misrepresent the advantages of 401(k)-style plans. Under the old system, says Ponnuru, benefits were dependent on total years worked and the worker’s final salary. If a worker lost his or her job in their 40s, they were actually at a permanent disadvantage. Ponnuru speculates that some of the Oklahoma workers written about in the Washington Post article “might well have been better off if the shift toward 401(k)s had happened decades earlier” because those savings would have lasted longer and continued to grow over time.
Third, Ponnuru’s Bloomberg article says many of the doomsayers are guilty of using misleading statistics to prove that America is in a “retirement crisis” because so many families have lost their pension benefits. In fact, he says, this pessimism is unwarranted because more workers participate in retirement savings today than in the past. “Count all retirement plans” – pension and 401(k) – “and nearly three-quarters of near-retirees have them,” Ponnuru writes.
Fourth, he criticizes the retirement nay-sayers who fail to look at how much the lifestyle for today’s retirees has actually improved. If the loss of pensions were really driving retirees to the brink of poverty, statistics would show it, but the opposite seems to be happening, suggests Ponnuru. One telling fact: if you compare the median income of senior households between 1989 and 2013 – even after adjusting for inflation – you would find today’s seniors enjoying an income that is one-third higher than their predecessors.
Is Ponnuru suggesting that everything is rosy in Retirement Land? No, he does acknowledge some major issues: people aren’t saving enough, and, despite improvements, not all workers have access to retirement saving plans. He also has a few other suggestions to make things better for retirees such as adjusting payroll taxes on older workers and making changes to Social Security. But on balance, the tone of the Bloomberg article is positive, maybe a bit too positive, we think. While it may be true that old-style pensions were never the panacea some claim they were, here at AgingOptions we are dismayed to read of the paltry rate of retirement savings that continues to plague many workers, even older ones. For example, this Time magazine article from a few years ago reported that more than one-fourth of financial survey respondents over 55 had no retirement savings at all, and another 26 percent had balances of $50,000 or less. This may not represent what Ponnuru calls a “retirement crisis” but it sounds like one to us.
However, the real retirement crisis is not merely the failure to save, but the failure to plan. In our experience at AgingOptions, even setting aside plenty of savings is no guarantee of a secure retirement, because few financial plans can survive a true retirement emergency. Instead you need a truly comprehensive plan in which finances, legal protection, medical coverage, housing choices and family communication are all working together interdependently. We call that an AgingOptions LifePlan.
If you’re intrigued and ready to find out more, there’s a simple way to do just that: accept our invitation to attend a free LifePlanning Seminar with Rajiv Nagaich, at a location that’s convenient for you. This could well be the most important few hours you’ll ever spend when it comes to securing your retirement future. Click here for our Upcoming Events page where you can register for the seminar of your choice, or call us for assistance. It will be our pleasure to help guide you into a secure and fruitful retirement – and there’s no time like the present to get started. Age on!
(originally reported at www.bloomberg.com)
Download Part 2
Is there anyone out there who wants to be happier, healthier and more productive in the New Year? We suspect the unanimous response is, “Of course.” Well, apparently the secret is all in the timing – or at least that’s the conclusion from this fascinating article from the Wall Street Journal. Written by author and behaviorist Daniel Pink, the article is called “How to Be Healthier, Happier and More Productive: It’s All in the Timing.” Author Pink asks, “When is the best time to exercise or do creative work? Research on the science of timing has answers.”
While this article is not written specifically to retirees and other boomers approaching retirement age, we think it has strong applicability. Most of us know from our experience at home or in the workplace that we have those times of day when we can really get things done – as well as those other times when our brain is in a fog and our body lacks the energy for big tasks. The news from this article, based on extensive research which Daniel Pink is highlighting in an upcoming book on the subject, is that the so-called “science of timing” isn’t imaginary – it’s very real. Knowing this, and how it affects you as an individual, will help you make the most of your day, no matter what stage of life you’re presently in.
“You’re probably getting ready to make a few New Year’s resolutions, solemn promises to yourself to behave better in 2018,” writes Pink. “You might have pondered how you’re going to accomplish those goals, who could help you and why you need to change. But if you’re like most people—and social science suggests that you and I are like most people—you’ve neglected a question that could help you actually stick to those resolutions: ‘When?’” He adds that most of us think the question of what time of day is the best time is more gut-level, when in fact “timing is really a science.” While the ways we measure time – seconds, minutes and hours – are basically a human invention, there’s one inescapable measurement of time that affects every human being: the 24-hour day. “We inhabit a planet that turns on its axis at a steady speed in a regular pattern, exposing us to consistent periods of light and dark,” says Pink in the Wall Street Journal. “The day is perhaps the most important way that we divide, configure and evaluate our time.” By understanding that fact, and making better timing decisions, we can improve our overall effectiveness and happiness.
Science has confirmed what most of us suspect: our cognitive abilities change, sometimes dramatically, over the course of a day. “We are smarter, faster and more creative in some parts of the day than others,” says Pink, adding that “these daily fluctuations can be extreme.” (One researcher said, “The performance change between the daily high point and the daily low point can be equivalent to the effect on performance of drinking the legal limit of alcohol.”) Most people experience what Daniel Pink calls “the day in three acts” – peak, trough and rebound. The peak is typically in the morning, cresting at about noon, and is generally “the best time to tackle work that requires heads-down attention and analysis, such as writing a legal brief or auditing financial statements.” By contrast, the trough, typically in early to mid-afternoon, brings with it “a corresponding fall in our ability to remain focused and constrain our inhibitions.” This isn’t the best time to plan that important meeting or work on that project that demands concentration and creativity.
And here’s something else you should know about the trough, according to research. “The trough,” writes Daniel Pink, “is an especially dangerous time for health-care professionals and their patients. In a study published in 2006 in Quality and Safety in Health Care, researchers at Duke Medical Center reviewed about 90,000 surgeries at the hospital and found that harmful anesthesia errors were three times more likely in procedures that began at 3 p.m. than at 8 a.m.” We advise you to schedule your medical appointments accordingly.
What about the rebound? For most people this occurs in the late afternoon or early evening. During this time of day, “most people are somewhat less vigilant than during the peak, but more alert and in a better mood than during the trough. That combination has advantages.” The rebound period is a good time for “brainstorming sessions and other creative pursuits,” according to Daniel Pink. Oh, and here’s one more important bit of information for you night owls: you tend to experience these three phases differently from others, so we encourage you to read the Wall Street Journal article by Daniel Pink and learn how time of day affects you.
The article contains much more information about these phases of the day and how knowing this about ourselves can make us more productive, help us get more exercise, teach us when and how to relax, and improve our overall mood. It’s an insightful look at our human behavior, well worth the read (again for your convenience here’s the link to the article). We think it will help you experience a greater sense of satisfaction in how you spend your days.
Here at AgingOptions, there’s one thing we do know about timing: too many people tend to procrastinate when it comes to planning for retirement. There is no time like the present! That’s why we offer free seminars on our unique approach to retirement planning, called LifePlanning, showing you how all the essential aspects of retirement can and must work together: finances, housing, legal, medical and family. It really is possible to approach retirement with a plan that is comprehensive and powerful, allowing you to achieve your dreams for the safe, secure and fruitful retirement you’ve always wanted. Our LifePlanning Seminars are offered throughout the area, so for upcoming dates and locations, simply click here for our Upcoming Events page where you can register online. (If you prefer to register by phone, give us a call during the week.) Don’t put it off! Come join Rajiv Nagaich at an AgingOptions LifePlanning Seminar and start the New Year with a newfound sense of confidence and peace of mind.
It will be our pleasure to meet you!
(originally reported at www.wsj.com)
The start of a new year means that it won’t be long before today’s high school seniors start receiving acceptance letters from the colleges and universities to which they’ve applied. And along with those welcome letters will come a less welcome decision: how is the family going to afford the soaring costs of higher education? Because this question may involve grandparents helping with college expenses, possibly even by co-signing a student loan, we felt it was timely to present this article once again as a cautionary tale for our AgingOptions readers.
Last year we reported on an alarming statistic from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau stating that the number of older Americans burdened by student loans they assumed on behalf of their children and grandchildren has increased four-fold over the past ten years. Student loan debt owed by people 60 and older now amounts to nearly $67 billion – and climbing. This sobering article published in the Washington Post details this growing concern, describing a debt load on well-intentioned seniors that the article calls “staggering.” There are now more than 2.8 million borrowers aged 60 and older affected by student loans, up from about 700,000 in 2005. “The skyrocketing cost of college has placed a particular burden on older Americans,” says the Post article. Many of these seniors are already “struggling to pay back growing debts in their retirement years, according to the (government) report. Nearly 40 percent of federal student loan borrowers over age 65 are in default, the highest rate for any age group.” Borrowers over 65 represented more than one-third of all student loan defaults in 2015.
In other words, the crushing problem of student loan debt, which now totals nearly $1.4 trillion in the U.S., is not just a problem for younger workers and recent graduates. It is, says the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “an intergenerational problem.” The Washington Post article explains that “a slow job market recovery, growing income inequality and stagnant wages have made it difficult for younger Americans to be economically independent, and now there are signs that those financial struggles are dragging down their parents and grandparents as well.”
A growing number of seniors tell researchers that they have had to forego medical treatments and cut back on other essentials because of the pressures of student loan debt. Even more ominously, more and more seniors are reporting that their Social Security payments – the only source of retirement income for more than a third of older Americans – have been partially seized in order to satisfy demands for student loan repayments.
On top of the mortgages and other loans still carried by many seniors, student loans add a heavy load. The average borrower 60 and older with a student loan owes $23,500, about twice the average amount from a decade ago. Besides the slow economy, experts blame the debt hike on rapidly rising costs of college and the pressure to get an education. The College Board estimates that a four-year degree from a public college or university now costs more than $80,000 – and for a private school the total is more than twice that amount. “Increasingly,” writes the Post, “older borrowers are being taken by surprise by student loan debt, according to financial advisers. Often parents and grandparents co-sign loans — the majority of student loans are co-signed by people age 55 and up — assuming they’ll be off the hook once the borrower graduates from school and lands a job. But increasingly, that’s not the case.”
If you’re facing pressure from your child or grandchild to co-sign a student loan, we strongly urge you to put the brakes on the conversation until you’ve met with a qualified retirement planner like those of us here at AgingOptions. If you’ll call our office we will be glad to suggest some strategies to help you make the right decision. It’s essential that you understand the huge problem represented by these burdensome debts! Instead of feeling obligated to co-sign, you may be able to suggest other options for your loved one to finance their education, including attending a less expensive school or working while they matriculate. No matter what, we urge you not to agree to take on the costs of someone else’s education until you’ve talked with an expert – because only then can you decide what to do, and make the decision with your eyes wide open.
Retirement planning is filled with important decisions. How can I protect my assets so I don’t outlive my funds? Where’s the best place for me to live as I age? What are the appropriate choices for my medical care needs? Are there certain legal preparations and processes I should pay attention to as I age? How can I make sure my family is knowledgeable and supportive of my wishes? In the past you may have had to consult several different professional services to get the right answers to these and other retirement-related questions, but no more. All these now are part of a breakthrough planning process we call LifePlanning. Your LifePlan, prepared with the supportive guidance of the AgingOptions team of experts, becomes your blueprint as you build the secure and fruitful retirement you’ve always hoped for.
Find out more about LifePlanning by attending a free LifePlanning Seminar soon. These seminars take just a few hours and are packed with valuable information – and they’re absolutely free. Find out for yourself! Click here to see a listing of upcoming LifePlanning Seminars and register online for the seminar of your choice. Or if you prefer, call us for information and registration during the week. No matter what your retirement questions, it will be our privilege to provide you with solid, no-nonsense answers. We’ll see you soon!
(originally reported at www.washingtonpost.com)